Skip to main content

Cars and Tech


Twelve years ago, when I bought my car, my decision criteria were simple. I wanted a car that is fun to drive, had good reliability, and was gas efficient; traits that were missing in my prior car. I did not put a lot of weight on the technological innovations the car had; I was happy with a good navigation system, a CD player that held multiple CDs, and a backup camera that made parallel parking easier. At the time, almost all car manufacturers provided undifferentiated versions of these capabilities, with minor tweaks to the user interface, which made my selection a lot easier.

Over the years as the technology advanced, these originally innovative features started to feel obsolete. It was almost impossible to upgrade the hardware with newer and faster components, and software did not have a better story.  Only if either had issues or bugs, did the manufacturer offer an upgrade, through vehicle recalls or maintenance, or through map update CDs on a yearly basis, that captured changes in routes, points of interest, and changes because of new construction.

In the meantime, smart phones became indispensable devices, not only providing the basics of phone calls, text messages, and web browsing, but also the plethora of applications that allowed us to do everything on these small devices from navigation, to listening to music, to watching videos, and playing games. And with the brilliant invention of the car phone holder, I found myself shifting away from the built-in technology systems, to using my iPhone as the primary device for everything in the car.

Sure, it was less convenient to have all the wires hanging from the phone to charge it and connect it with the audio system, interfering with the gear shifter on my manual transmission car, having a much smaller screen than the built-in one, and substituting the on screen controls with the analog ones in the car; but these inconveniences paled in front of the infinite upgradeability of the phone’s software and hardware. There was no need to upgrade maps, or to worry about phone address book integration, to load or unload music CDs, or to worry about what audio book to choose ahead of a long commute or trip. And with the improvement of voice recognition using all these apps while driving became much easier.

I often wondered if it were more convenient for auto manufacturers to forgo building systems for in-car navigation/entertainment, and just have a space in the dash, where you can install or plugin your favorite phone/tablet, and easily integrate with the car’s analog controls. Then both CarPlay and Android Play came on the radar and made something akin to that possible. Car manufactures still build the entertainment and navigation systems but allowed smart phones to use the display and entertainment systems seamlessly.

On a couple of recent trips, I rented cars that supported CarPlay, and even though the car had an up to date navigation system with current maps and points of interest, I found myself using my iPhone and CarPlay almost exclusively, if only for the real-time traffic updates and rerouting, listening to Spotify or my podcasts, and setting destinations through decent voice control using Siri. I believe the trend of forgoing the built-in systems for easily updatable software and hardware platforms such as the smart phone devices will continue, and unless auto manufacturers offer similar capabilities, their built-in systems will become obsolete.

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Kindle Paperwhite

I have always been allergic to buying specialized electronic devices that do only one thing, such as the Kindle, the iPod, and fitness trackers. Why buy these when technology evolves so fast that a multi-purpose device such as the phone or a smart watch can eventually do the same thing, but with the convenience of updates that fix bugs and add functionality? So, I was shocked when this weekend I made an impulse buy and got the newest Kindle Paperwhite—a special purpose device for reading eBooks. I was walking past the Amazon store in the mall and saw that the newest Kindle Paperwhites were marked down by $40 for the holidays. The device looked good in the display, so I went in to look at it closely. The Paperwhite is small and light, with a 6” screen that is backlit and waterproof.   The text was crisp and readable, and in the ambient light, it felt like I am reading a printed book. I was sold and bought it on the spot. At home I have struggled to put it down. The bo...
2 comments
Read more

A paper a day keeps the doctor away: NoDB

In most database systems, the user defines the shape of the data that is stored and queried using concepts such as entities and relations. The database system takes care of translating that shape into physical storage, and managing its lifecycle. Most of the systems store data in the form of tuples, either in row format, or broken down into columns and stored in columnar format. The system also stores metadata associated with the data, that helps with speedy retrieval and processing. Defining the shape of the data a priori, and transforming it from the raw or ingestion format to the storage format is a cost that database systems incur to make queries faster. What if we can have fast queries without incurring that initial cost? In the paper " NoDB: Efficient Query Execution on Raw Data Files ", the authors examine that question, and advocate a system (NoDB) that answers it. The authors start with the motivation for such a system. With the recent explosion of data...
Post a Comment
Read more

A paper a day keeps the dr away: Dapper a Large-Scale Distributed Systems Tracing Infrastructure

Modern Internet scale applications are a challenge to monitor and diagnose. The applications are usually comprised of complex distributed systems that are built by multiple teams, sometimes using different languages and technologies. When one component fails or misbehaves, it becomes a nightmare to figure out what went wrong and where. Monitoring and tracing systems aim to make that problem a bit more tractable, and Dapper, a system by Google for large scale distributed systems tracing is one such system. The paper starts by setting the context for Dapper through the use of a real service: "universal search". In universal search, the user types in a query that gets federated to multiple search backends such as web search, image search, local search, video search, news search, as well as advertising systems to display ads. The results are then combined and presented back to the user. Thousands of machines could be involved in returning that result, and any poor p...
Post a Comment
Read more